The Cherry Hill school district is suing Ben Shore, alleging that he has filed numerous and “vexatious” public records requests with the district. (Shore photo by Ben Shore; school bus photo by Dana DiFilippo/New Jersey Monitor)
A Superior Court judge has tossed the Cherry Hill school board’s lawsuit against a records requester it claimed had harassed them by submitting an average of one records request per month over 18 months.
Judge Michael Mikulski dismissed the suit, which sought to bar Benjamin Shore and his journalistic outlet, Shore Investigates, from submitting requests for public documents for one year, with Mikulski citing a New Jersey law aimed at barring lawsuits meant to censor or chill political speech.
“Plaintiffs have shown no evidence of any ill-intent of Defendants here. In fact, the record reflects defendants’ willingness to cooperate with the board in making the requests less intrusive,” Mikulski wrote in the seven-page ruling.
New Jersey’s Uniform Public Expression Protection Act allows judges to dismiss lawsuits meant to chill speech or political engagement on an expedited basis. The court must award attorney’s fees and costs to the defendant if a suit is dismissed under the law.
The court found Shore’s request to toss the case as a strategic lawsuit against public participation met all three required bars.
“This is the right outcome. No public agency should sue anyone, let alone reporters, because they file an OPRA request or two a month,” said CJ Griffin, an attorney specializing in public records who represented Shore. “Public records belong to the public and no one should live in fear that they will be sued for seeking basic transparency.”
Griffin has represented the New Jersey Monitor in a range of legal matters.
Because Shore was acting in a journalistic capacity, the case centered on a matter of public concern, the judge wrote, satisfying the first prong, while the second prong was automatically met because he did not work for the government. He said the third prong was met because the school board submitted no evidence to support its claim that Shore filed Open Public Records Act requests with the goal of burdening or harassing board staff.
“Here, the intent is the dispositive factor, which the court finds none in the evidence presented,” Mikulski wrote. “The court finds the amount of time the board must expend in order to respond to the requestor OPRA requests is not a valid reason for its action.”
The judge further dismissed claims that a website Shore set up to assist with filing records requests with the Cherry Hill Board of Education could mislead residents into believing the site belonged to the district.
No facts backed up that assertion either, the judge said, noting the website was noncommercial and included at least two disclaimers that said it was not affiliated with the school district.
GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.
by Nikita Biryukov, New Jersey Monitor
August 4, 2026
by Nikita Biryukov, New Jersey Monitor
August 4, 2026
A Superior Court judge has tossed the Cherry Hill school board’s lawsuit against a records requester it claimed had harassed them by submitting an average of one records request per month over 18 months.
Judge Michael Mikulski dismissed the suit, which sought to bar Benjamin Shore and his journalistic outlet, Shore Investigates, from submitting requests for public documents for one year, with Mikulski citing a New Jersey law aimed at barring lawsuits meant to censor or chill political speech.
“Plaintiffs have shown no evidence of any ill-intent of Defendants here. In fact, the record reflects defendants’ willingness to cooperate with the board in making the requests less intrusive,” Mikulski wrote in the seven-page ruling.
New Jersey’s Uniform Public Expression Protection Act allows judges to dismiss lawsuits meant to chill speech or political engagement on an expedited basis. The court must award attorney’s fees and costs to the defendant if a suit is dismissed under the law.
The court found Shore’s request to toss the case as a strategic lawsuit against public participation met all three required bars.
“This is the right outcome. No public agency should sue anyone, let alone reporters, because they file an OPRA request or two a month,” said CJ Griffin, an attorney specializing in public records who represented Shore. “Public records belong to the public and no one should live in fear that they will be sued for seeking basic transparency.”
Griffin has represented the New Jersey Monitor in a range of legal matters.
Because Shore was acting in a journalistic capacity, the case centered on a matter of public concern, the judge wrote, satisfying the first prong, while the second prong was automatically met because he did not work for the government. He said the third prong was met because the school board submitted no evidence to support its claim that Shore filed Open Public Records Act requests with the goal of burdening or harassing board staff.
“Here, the intent is the dispositive factor, which the court finds none in the evidence presented,” Mikulski wrote. “The court finds the amount of time the board must expend in order to respond to the requestor OPRA requests is not a valid reason for its action.”
The judge further dismissed claims that a website Shore set up to assist with filing records requests with the Cherry Hill Board of Education could mislead residents into believing the site belonged to the district.
No facts backed up that assertion either, the judge said, noting the website was noncommercial and included at least two disclaimers that said it was not affiliated with the school district.
New Jersey Monitor is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. New Jersey Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Terrence T. McDonald for questions: info@newjerseymonitor.com.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. AP and Getty images may not be republished. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of any other photos and graphics.
Nikita Biryukov is an award-winning reporter who covers state government and politics for the New Jersey Monitor, with a focus on fiscal issues and voting. He has reported from the capitol since 2018 and joined the Monitor at its launch in 2021. The Rutgers University graduate previously covered state government and politics for the New Jersey Globe. Before then he covered local government in New Brunswick as a freelancer for the Home News Tribune. You can reach him at [email protected].
New Jersey Monitor is part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
© New Jersey Monitor, 2026
v1.133.2
New Jersey Monitor provides fair and tough reporting on the issues affecting New Jersey, from political corruption to education to criminal and social justice. We strive to hold powerful people accountable and explain how their actions affect New Jerseyans from Montague to Cape May.
New Jersey Monitor, PO Box 6843, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
We’re part of States Newsroom, the nation’s largest state-focused nonprofit news organization.
Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our website. (See full republishing guidelines.)
© New Jersey Monitor, 2026
Leave a Reply